Is radiocarbon dating reliable
That doesn't seem like a sound scientific process, does it?And what was it that finally got the scientists to agree on their uncertain calibration curve? The problem with all these theories and conclusions is that they hark back to the scientists' blind belief in the false theory of evolution.The bottom line is that scientists cannot reliably use radiocarbon dating on artifacts beyond the time of Christ.The method they use to attempt to do so is twisted to fit evolutionary theory.Once the "clock" starts, there is no gain or loss in radiocarbon elements used in dating. In coral, the carbon-14 decay rate is not stable; it picks up radioactive isotopes over time.
Scientists, however, will push the envelope to 10,000 B. Scientists now claim 50,000 years is as far back as this method can go.That is circular reasoning - defending the method by using the very same method!On top of that, radiocarbon dating coral presents great difficulties that make it unreliable. Because of another assumption in radiocarbon dating: that it is a closed system.That is science based on a shifting foundation of sand!Yet that is the necessity by which these scientists are driven.